Effettua una nuova ricerca
More results...
Nelson Asofa-Solomona has flown to Sydney in his bid to contest the grading of his careless high tackle charge, desperate to take the field in the grand final against the Panthers. Live below!
The hulking prop was handed a four-game ban with the early guilty plea after making contact with the head of his opposite man Lindsay Collins on Friday night.
In their bid to have Asofa-Solomona available to take the field, the Storm were successful in having the NRL fast-track the hearing from its usual Tuesday evening slot to Monday.
Watch the best coverage of the 2024 NRL finals, with expert analysis and every game until the Grand Final LIVE with no ad-breaks during play, on Kayo. New to Kayo? Start your free trial today >
IMAGINE WHAT YOU COULD BE BUYING INSTEAD. For Free and confidential support call 1800 858 858 or visit gamblinghelponline.org.au.
To be cleared, the Kiwi international will need to have his charge downgraded from a grade three all the way down to a grade one offence which would incur only a fine.
If he’s unsuccessful and is found guilty of his high tackle, Asofa-Solomona will sit out for five games, with the Storm willing to take the gamble for the off chance he’s cleared to play.
FOLLOW ALONG IN THE LIVE BLOG BELOW. CAN’T SEE IT? CLICK HERE!
Asofa-Solomona is the only player this season to attempt a double downgrade at the judiciary.
Dr Matthew Morgan was called upon by NRL counsel Lachlan Gyles and stated what wasn’t included in his report was the “definite fact when he plays the ball backwards, disorientation is what I’m trying to get at”.
Gyles pointed out that Collins played the ball the wrong way and also needed assistance to remain on his feet as clear signs of a concussion.
Dr Morgan also explained what was meant in his report surrounding the results of Collins’ test. However, the results of those tests are confidential.
Dr Morgan was unable to go into the symptoms he showed without Collins’ consent, however he made it clear that the Roosters prop showed signs of concussion.
The Storm’s counsel Nick Ghabar asked if a player can pass the SCAT-5 test and still be diagnosed with a category one concussion, to which Dr Morgan agreed.
However, the results of that test remain confidential and the NRL counsel objected to the line of questioning that compared Collins’ concussion to past head knocks, which was upheld by the chair.
‘Risk for unstable shoulders is high’ | 01:59
The Storm’s counsel questioned Dr Morgan, asking where the symptoms are that prove Collins’ diagnosis, with the NRL objecting.
Ghabar suggested that the diagnosis was based on Dr Morgan’s “observation he showed category one signs”.
Once again, Dr Morgan made it clear he cannot disclose the symptoms shown by Collins due to confidentiality concerns.
The comparison was made with Val Holmes’ tackle on Payne Haas in Origin II this year which was classed as a category one charge.
MORE NRL NEWS
MADGE GONE: Blues, Maguire part ways as door to Broncos job swings wide open
TALKING POINTS: Luai lesson Nicho should follow; Storm trait Panthers should fear
CRAWLS: Don’t fall for NAS sympathy con; ridiculous claims over Cleary blast
The NRL argued Asofa-Solomona’s plea of guilty, only contesting the charge, is an agreement he committed foul play.
They also claimed all indicators are in line with a grade three charge, claiming Asofa-Solomona made no attempt to lower his body.
They described the level of force as a “high level” which was significantly higher than that of Holmes’ Origin tackle.
Gyles then established direct contact was made to the head of Collins, with teammate Eliesa Katoa dropping his body, while he argued Asofa-Solomona did the opposite.
Asofa-Solomona will likely be free to return to the field in Round 2 next season should he be handed the full five-game ban.
One match will be served during the grand final, while three will be ticked off during New Zealand’s Pacific Championships campaign, meaning one more needs to be served in Round 1.
***** l’articolo pubblicato è ritenuto affidabile e di qualità*****
Visita il sito e gli articoli pubblicati cliccando sul seguente link
Informativa sui diritti di autore
La legge sul diritto d’autore art. 70 consente l’utilizzazione libera del materiale laddove ricorrano determinate condizioni: la citazione o riproduzione di brani o parti di opera e la loro comunicazione al pubblico sono liberi qualora siano effettuati per uso di critica, discussione, insegnamento o ricerca scientifica entro i limiti giustificati da tali fini e purché non costituiscano concorrenza all’utilizzazione economica dell’opera citata o riprodotta.
Vuoi richiedere la rimozione dell’articolo?
Clicca qui
***** l’articolo pubblicato è ritenuto affidabile e di qualità*****
Visita il sito e gli articoli pubblicati cliccando sul seguente link
Informativa sui diritti di autore
La legge sul diritto d’autore art. 70 consente l’utilizzazione libera del materiale laddove ricorrano determinate condizioni: la citazione o riproduzione di brani o parti di opera e la loro comunicazione al pubblico sono liberi qualora siano effettuati per uso di critica, discussione, insegnamento o ricerca scientifica entro i limiti giustificati da tali fini e purché non costituiscano concorrenza all’utilizzazione economica dell’opera citata o riprodotta.
Vuoi richiedere la rimozione dell’articolo?
Clicca qui
Informativa sui diritti di autore
Questa è una parte dell’articolo originale
Vuoi approfondire l’argomento, criticarlo, discutere
come previsto dalla legge sul diritto d’autore art. 70
Sei l’autore dell’articolo e vuoi richiedere la rimozione?
Per richiedere la rimozione dell’articolo clicca qui
La legge sul diritto d’autore art. 70 consente l’utilizzazione libera del materiale laddove ricorrano determinate condizioni: “Il riassunto, la citazione (source link) o la riproduzione di brani o di parti di opera e la loro comunicazione al pubblico sono liberi se effettuati per uso di critica o di discussione, nei limiti giustificati da tali fini e purché non costituiscano concorrenza all’utilizzazione economica dell’opera; se effettuati a fini di insegnamento o di ricerca scientifica l’utilizzo deve inoltre avvenire per finalità illustrative e per fini non commerciali